Net Neutrality, Exclusivity Contracts, and Internet Fragmentation
نویسندگان
چکیده
Net neutrality is believed to prevent Internet fragmentation. We examine the relationship between net neutrality regulation and Internet fragmentation in a game-theoretic model that considers the interplay between termination fees, exclusivity and competition between two Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and between two Content Providers (CPs). An exclusivity arrangement between an ISP and a CP reduces the CPs exposure to some end users but it also reduces competition among the CPs. Fragmentation arises in equilibrium when competition between CPs is very strong, the CPsrevenues from advertisements are very low, the content of the CPs is highly complementary, or the termination fees are high. We nd that the absence of fragmentation is always bene cial for consumers, as they can enjoy all available content. Policy interventions that prevent fragmentation are thus good for consumers. However, results for total welfare are more mixed. A zero-price rule on tra¢ c termination is neither a su¢ cient nor a necessary policy instrument to prevent fragmentation. In fact, regulatory interventions may be ine¤ective or even detrimental to welfare and are only warranted under special circumstances.
منابع مشابه
Net neutrality and the value chain for video
Net neutrality has, for a number of years, been a topic of often heated discussion in the Internet and telecom community. The issue was put firmly on the agenda by Tim Wu in his famous paper (Wu, 2003) following the discussion on a number of net-neutrality related issues by other authors (e.g. Lemley and Lessig, 2001). Since then, net neutrality has been analyzed extensively in academia and in ...
متن کاملExclusivity, Contingent Control Rights, and the Design of Internet Portal Alliances July 2009
We explore the relationship between exclusivity and the use of verifiable performance measures to allocate state-contingent control rights using a sample of over 100 Internet portal alliance contracts. We find that the stronger the exclusivity arrangement between the parties, the more likely are contingent control rights to be incorporated into alliance contracts. In particular we find evidence...
متن کاملMonitoring quality of Internet access services in the context of net neutrality Draft BEREC report
متن کامل
Network neutrality debate and ISP inter-relations: traffic exchange, revenue sharing, and disconnection threat
The network neutrality debate originally stems from the growing traffic asymmetry between ISPs, questioning the established peering or transit agreements. That tendency is due to popular content providers connected to the network through a single ISP, and whose traffic is not charged by distant ISPs. We propose in this paper to review the economic transit agreements between ISPs in order to det...
متن کاملInterconnection in the Internet: the policy challenge
In days past, Internet Service Providers (ISPs) relied on two basic types of contracts for exchanging traffic (peering and transit) and ISP interconnection was not regulated. As we explained in (Faratin, Clark et al. 2007), the world of Internet interconnection is no longer so simple. The increased complexity poses significant challenges for policymakers who might contemplate regulating Interne...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Information Systems Research
دوره 26 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015